Site Map
9th April 2003
- PhyloCode Discussion - Home
- PhyloCode Discussion - What's New
- PhyloCode Discussion - Search
- PhyloCode Discussion - Site Map
- Directory archive -
- PhyloCode Discussion - Mail Archive
- Directory messages -
- Message 2000-07-0001: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0002: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0003: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0004: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0005: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0006: Art 10.1
- Message 2000-07-0007: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0008: Re: Art 10.1
- Message 2000-07-0009: RE: Art 10.1
- Message 2000-07-0010: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-07-0011: Re: Stem-based taxon definitions
- Message 2000-08-0001: MANNERS [was Re: Stem-based taxon definitions]
- Message 2000-08-0002: MANNERS [was Re: Stem-based taxon definitions]
- Message 2000-09-0001: Why does the PhyloCode use a hierarchy?
- Message 2000-09-0002: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0003: Re: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0004: Re: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0005: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0006: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0007: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0008: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0009: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-09-0010: New critics
- Message 2000-09-0011: Fwd: New critics
- Message 2000-09-0012: Re: New critics
- Message 2000-09-0013: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0001: Benton's paper
- Message 2000-10-0002: RE: Benton's paper
- Message 2000-10-0003: Aesthetic Note (semi-humorous)
- Message 2000-10-0004: Re: Aesthetic Note (semi-humorous)
- Message 2000-10-0005: Re: Aesthetic Note (semi-humorous)
- Message 2000-10-0006: Fwd: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0007: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0008: Fwd: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0009: Moore's hybrid example
- Message 2000-10-0010: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0011: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0012: Fwd: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0013: Fwd: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0014: Fwd: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0015: RE: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0016: RE: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0017: RE: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0018: Fwd: RE: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0019: RE: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0020: RE: Re: RE: RE: Nathan Wilson's question
- Message 2000-10-0021: Re: Moore's hybrid example (was Nathan Wilson's question)
- Message 2000-10-0022: Re: Moore's hybrid example (was Nathan Wilson's question)
- Message 2000-10-0023: Hybrid specifiers
- Message 2000-10-0024: Re: Hybrid specifiers
- Message 2000-10-0025: Re: Hybrid specifiers
- Message 2000-10-0026: Re: Hybrid specifiers
- Message 2000-10-0027: Defining species
- Message 2000-10-0028: [unknown]
- Message 2000-10-0029: UNSUBSCRIBE PhyloCode
- Message 2000-11-0001: New(?) Paper
- Message 2001-02-0001: Addendum 1: Clade names from apomorphy names
- Message 2001-02-0002: Addendum 2: Nominal apomorphy as specifier
- Message 2001-02-0003: Addendum 3: Specifiers for non-apomorphy-based apomorphy-derived clade names
- Message 2001-02-0004: Re: Addendum 3: Specifiers for non-apomorphy-based apomorphy-derived clade names
- Message 2001-02-0005: Another example
- Message 2001-02-0006: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0007: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0008: Wagner's proposals
- Message 2001-02-0009: Re: Another example
- Message 2001-02-0010: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0011: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0012: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0013: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0014: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0015: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0016: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0017: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0018: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0019: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0020: RE: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0021: Genus names
- Message 2001-02-0022: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0023: RE: Genus names
- Message 2001-02-0024: Re: RE: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0025: Re: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0026: Addendum 4: Conversion of generic epithets
- Message 2001-02-0027: Addendum 5: Simultaneous publication of generic epithets
- Message 2001-02-0028: Species and genus names [was: RE: Genus names]
- Message 2001-02-0029: Re: Addendum 4: Conversion of generic epithets
- Message 2001-02-0030: Re: RE: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0031: Re: Addendum 4: Conversion of generic epithets
- Message 2001-02-0032: Fwd: Species and genus names [was: RE: Genus names]
- Message 2001-02-0033: RE: apomorphy-based names
- Message 2001-02-0034: Re: Addendum 4: Conversion of generic epithets
- Message 2001-02-0035: Re: Addendum 4: Conversion of generic epithets
- Message 2001-02-0036: Re: Fwd: Species and genus names [was: RE: Genus names]
- Message 2001-02-0037: Addendum 1b: Clade names from apomorphy names
- Message 2001-02-0038: Genera as Clades
- Message 2001-02-0039: species and clades
- Message 2001-02-0040: Re: Genera as clades, Re: clades and species
- Message 2001-02-0041: Fwd: species and clades
- Message 2001-02-0042: Re: species and clades
- Message 2001-02-0043: Re: Fwd: species and clades
- Message 2001-02-0044: [unknown]
- Message 2001-02-0045: concerns
- Message 2001-02-0046: poorly known groups
- Message 2001-02-0047: Problems with the PhyloCode? [Re: your mail]
- Message 2001-02-0048: Fwd:
- Message 2001-02-0049: codes
- Message 2001-02-0050: Re: codes
- Message 2001-02-0051: Fwd: codes
- Message 2001-02-0052: Fwd: Re: codes
- Message 2001-02-0053: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0054: Re: Fwd: Re: codes
- Message 2001-02-0055: The root dichotomy of PhyloCoders [Re: Fwd: codes]
- Message 2001-02-0056: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0057: Re: Fwd: codes
- Message 2001-02-0058: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0059: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0060: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0061: Fwd: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0062: Possible resolution? Wishful thinking? [Re: Fwd: Re: Codes]
- Message 2001-02-0063: Possible resolution? Wishful thinking?
- Message 2001-02-0064: Re: Fwd: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0065: Re: Possible resolution? Wishful thinking?
- Message 2001-02-0066: Re: Fwd: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0067: Re: Possible resolution? Wishful thinking? [Re: Fwd: Re: Codes]
- Message 2001-02-0068: Re: Possible resolution? Wishful thinking? [Re: Fwd: Re: Codes]
- Message 2001-02-0069: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0070: Answers to questions
- Message 2001-02-0071: An invitation to free your Code [was: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Codes]
- Message 2001-02-0072: Distinction between Traditional and Phylogenetic (was Re: Codes)
- Message 2001-02-0073: On the Other Phylogenetic Systematics, Nixon and Carpenter
- Message 2001-02-0074: Re: On the Other Phylogenetic Systematics, Nixon and Carpenter
- Message 2001-02-0075: RE: On the Other Phylogenetic Systematics, Nixon and Carpenter
- Message 2001-02-0076: Re: Fwd: Re: Codes
- Message 2001-02-0077: Re: RE: On the Other Phylogenetic Systematics, Nixon and Carpenter
- Message 2001-02-0078: The starting phase of the PhyloCode and other issues
- Message 2001-02-0079: Re: The starting phase of the PhyloCode and other issues
- Message 2001-02-0080: Re: The starting phase of the PhyloCode and other issues
- Message 2001-02-0081: Re: The starting phase of the PhyloCode and other issues
- Message 2001-02-0082: David M's orthography question
- Message 2001-02-0083: PhyloCode Alphabet
- Message 2001-02-0084: Fwd: The starting phase of the PhyloCode and other issues
- Message 2001-02-0085: [unknown]
- Message 2001-02-0086: Re: PhyloCode Alphabet
- Message 2001-02-0087: Re: David M's orthography question
- Message 2001-03-0001: Re: GALTONIA THE FLOWER
- Message 2001-03-0002: Re: GALTONIA THE FLOWER
- Message 2001-03-0003: Fwd: Re: GALTONIA THE FLOWER
- Message 2001-03-0004: Re: GALTONIA THE FLOWER
- Message 2001-03-0005: Re: GALTONIA (a test case?)
- Message 2001-03-0006: Viruses?
- Message 2001-03-0007: Re: GALTONIA (a test case?)
- Message 2001-03-0008: Re: GALTONIA (a test case?)
- Message 2001-03-0009: Galtonia (a test case?)
- Message 2001-03-0010: Fwd: PhyloCode Test Case (Siphonophora?)
- Message 2001-03-0011: Siphonophora a real test case (forget Galtonia) (fwd)
- Message 2001-03-0012: Fwd: Viruses?
- Message 2001-03-0013: RE: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0014: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0015: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0016: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0017: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0018: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0019: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0020: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0021: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-03-0022: Re: Megalancosaurus, Longisquama & other oddballs
- Message 2001-06-0001: Prototypes for Next Low-Bandwidth Version of the Dinosauricon
- Message 2001-06-0002: 1 January 200n
- Message 2001-06-0003: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0004: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0005: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0006: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0007: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0008: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0009: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0010: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0011: Additions to PhyloCode web site
- Message 2001-06-0012: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0013: Re: Nomina Conversa
- Message 2001-06-0014: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0015: Re: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0016: Re: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0017: Re: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0018: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0019: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0020: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0021: Re: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0022: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0023: Re: Amphibia
- Message 2001-06-0024: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0025: Re: Vermes (jagged little pills)
- Message 2001-06-0026: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0027: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0028: Re: Fwd: Vermes
- Message 2001-06-0029: current usage (blunt talk)
- Message 2001-06-0030: Re: current usage (blunt talk)
- Message 2001-06-0031: Re: current usage (blunt talk)
- Message 2001-06-0032: Re: current usage (blunt talk)
- Message 2001-06-0033: Subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0034: Re: Subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0035: Re: [Re: Subscribers]
- Message 2001-06-0036: Re: [Re: Subscribers]
- Message 2001-06-0037: Re: [Re: Subscribers]
- Message 2001-06-0038: Subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0039: Re: Subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0040: Re: Subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0041: Re: current usage (blunt talk)
- Message 2001-06-0042: Re: Subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0043: Lophotrochozoa
- Message 2001-06-0044: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0045: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0046: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0047: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0048: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0049: subscribers (& "lophotrochozoans")
- Message 2001-06-0050: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0051: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0052: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0053: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0054: Re: subscribers
- Message 2001-06-0055: conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-based classification
- Message 2001-06-0056: Re: [conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-based classification]
- Message 2001-06-0057: Re: [conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-based classification]
- Message 2001-06-0058: Re: [conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-based classification]
- Message 2001-06-0059: RE: [conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-based classification]
- Message 2001-06-0060: Re: RE: [conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-basedclassification]
- Message 2001-06-0061: RE: conflict between monophyletic taxonomy and rank-based classification
- Message 2001-06-0062: Re: subscribers (& "lophotrochozoans")
- Message 2001-06-0063: Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names
- Message 2001-06-0064: Re: [Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names]
- Message 2001-06-0065: Re: [Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names]
- Message 2001-06-0066: Re: [Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names
- Message 2001-06-0067: Re: [Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names
- Message 2001-06-0068: Re: T-J Extinction event article (more media errors?)
- Message 2001-06-0069: [unknown]
- Message 2001-06-0070: Nipping the bud
- Message 2001-06-0071: Re: Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names
- Message 2001-06-0072: Re: [Making Up Names _versus_ Emending Names
- Message 2001-06-0073: Re: Nipping the bud
- Message 2001-06-0074: Re: Nipping the bud
- Message 2001-06-0075: Re: T-J Extinction event article (more media errors?)
- Message 2001-06-0076: Some PhyloCode Considerations
- Message 2001-06-0077: Re: T-J Extinction event article (more media errors?)
- Message 2001-06-0078: Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature
- Message 2001-06-0079: Fwd: Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature
- Message 2001-06-0080: Re: Fwd: Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature
- Message 2001-06-0081: Re: T-J Extinction event article (more media errors?)
- Message 2001-06-0082: Re: T-J Extinction event article (more media errors?)
- Message 2001-06-0083: Re: T-J Extinction event article (more media errors?)
- Message 2001-06-0084: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0085: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0086: Fwd: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0087: Fwd: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0088: RE: S. Redhead's recent posts
- Message 2001-06-0089: Stepping back
- Message 2001-06-0090: Fwd: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0091: Re: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0092: hands off genera?
- Message 2001-06-0093: Re: Fwd: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs
- Message 2001-06-0094: Notation for Distincton Between Systems
- Message 2001-06-0095: Fwd: hands off genera?
- Message 2001-06-0096: Re: hands off genera?
- Message 2001-06-0097: species names
- Message 2001-06-0098: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0099: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0100: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0101: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0102: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0103: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0104: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0105: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0106: Re: hands off genera?
- Message 2001-06-0107: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0108: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0109: Re: hands off genera?
- Message 2001-06-0110: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0111: Re: Fwd: hands off genera?
- Message 2001-06-0112: Re: finalization of PhyloCode "behind closed doors"
- Message 2001-06-0113: Re: species names
- Message 2001-06-0114: RE: On naming taxa
- Message 2001-06-0115: Rankless classifications
- Message 2001-06-0116: Re: Rankless classifications
- Message 2001-06-0117: Crown groups
- Message 2001-06-0118: Re: Crown groups
- Message 2001-06-0119: Re: Crown groups
- Message 2001-06-0120: Re: Crown groups (long)
- Message 2001-06-0121: Re: Crown groups (long)
- Message 2001-06-0122: Re: Crown groups
- Message 2001-06-0123: Re: Crown groups (long)
- Message 2001-06-0124: Re: Crown groups (long)
- Message 2001-06-0125: Re: Crown groups (no longer long)
- Message 2001-06-0126: Crown groups mainstream?
- Message 2001-06-0127: Re: Crown groups mainstream?
- Message 2001-06-0128: Re: Crown groups mainstream?
- Message 2001-06-0129: Re: Crown groups mainstream?
- Message 2001-06-0130: My final (stern) warning about Mammalia
- Message 2001-06-0131: Please Read (sorry it is long)
- Message 2001-06-0132: Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)
- Message 2001-06-0133: Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)
- Message 2001-06-0134: Two mammal clade alternatives
- Message 2001-07-0001: Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)
- Message 2001-07-0002: Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)
- Message 2001-07-0003: view previous postings?
- Message 2001-07-0004: [unknown]
- Message 2001-09-0001: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0002: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0003: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0004: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0005: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0006: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0007: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0008: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0009: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0010: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0011: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0012: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0013: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0014: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0015: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0016: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0017: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0018: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0019: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0020: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0021: Re: Apomorphy-based definitions
- Message 2001-09-0022: Clades Composed of Individuals, not Species
- Message 2001-09-0023: defining clades/ancestors
- Message 2001-09-0024: Re: defining clades/ancestors
- Message 2001-09-0025: Re: defining clades/ancestors
- Message 2001-09-0026: [unknown]
- Message 2001-10-0001: Diffusion of the Phylocode in France
- Message 2001-10-0002: Subspecies
- Message 2001-10-0003: Re: Subspecies
- Message 2001-10-0004: ssp var f sp
- Message 2001-10-0005: Re: ssp var f sp
- Message 2001-10-0006: Re: ssp var f sp
- Message 2001-12-0001: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
- Message 2001-12-0002: Fwd: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
- Message 2001-12-0003: Re: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
- Message 2001-12-0004: Fwd: Re: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0005: Re: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0006: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0007: Re: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0008: Re: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0009: Fw: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0010: Fwd: Fw: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0011: Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0012: Re: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0013: Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0014: Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode
- Message 2001-12-0015: Systematics Association Annual Meeting
- Message 2001-12-0016: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (short)
- Message 2001-12-0017: Laurin, 2001-- Phylogenetic Taxonomy
- Message 2001-12-0018: Re: Laurin, 2001-- Phylogenetic Taxonomy
- Message 2002-01-0001: ?
- Message 2002-01-0002: Re: ?
- Message 2002-01-0003: Re: ?
- Message 2002-01-0004: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0005: Re: ?
- Message 2002-01-0006: Re: ?
- Message 2002-01-0007: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0008: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0009: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0010: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0011: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0012: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
- Message 2002-01-0013: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0014: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
- Message 2002-01-0015: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
- Message 2002-01-0016: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
- Message 2002-01-0017: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0018: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
- Message 2002-01-0019: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
- Message 2002-01-0020: Returned mail: see transcript for details
- Message 2002-01-0021: reply to David M on species
- Message 2002-01-0022: Fw: reply to David M on species
- Message 2002-01-0023: Re: remaining jobs before implementation of PhyloCode
- Message 2002-01-0024: Re: reply to David M on species
- Message 2002-02-0001: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0002: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0003: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0004: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0005: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0006: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0007: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0008: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0009: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0010: RE: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0011: Ostrom Vol ms
- Message 2002-02-0012: Re: Ostrom Vol ms
- Message 2002-02-0013: Reply to Jacques Gauthier re: reprints
- Message 2002-02-0014: RE: Reply to Jacques Gauthier re: reprints
- Message 2002-02-0015: Re: VERY Stupid question, but I dont know the answer...
- Message 2002-02-0016: RE: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0017: RE: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0018: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0019: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0020: RE: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0021: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0022: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0023: Re: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0024: RE: interesting style of definition
- Message 2002-02-0025: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0026: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0027: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0028: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0029: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0030: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-02-0031: Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)
- Message 2002-03-0001: ICSEB-VI
- Message 2002-04-0001: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0002: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0003: Fwd: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0004: Re: Fwd: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0005: Re: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0006: Fw: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0007: Re: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0008: Re: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0009: Re: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0010: Re: Gender of species names?
- Message 2002-04-0011: Newsletter: Something for Everyone ! 63010
- Message 2002-04-0012: Re: eumaniraptoran systematics
- Message 2002-04-0013: Re: eumaniraptoran systematics
- Message 2002-04-0014: Re: eumaniraptoran systematics
- Message 2002-04-0015: Re: eumaniraptoran systematics
- Message 2002-04-0016: Re: eumaniraptoran systematics
- Message 2002-04-0017: Re: eumaniraptoran systematics
- Message 2002-04-0018: genus definitions
- Message 2002-04-0019: Re: genus definitions
- Message 2002-04-0020: Re: genus definitions
- Message 2002-07-0001: [unknown]
- Message 2002-07-0002: strange website
- Message 2002-08-0001: "Last modified on July 1, 2002"
- Message 2002-08-0002: Re: "Last modified on July 1, 2002"
- Message 2002-08-0003: Re: "Last modified on July 1, 2002"
- Message 2002-08-0004: Re: "Last modified on July 1, 2002"
- Message 2002-08-0005: Re: "Last modified on July 1, 2002"
- Message 2002-08-0006: Fwd: "Last modified on July 1, 2002"
- Message 2002-08-0007: Orthography
- Message 2002-09-0001: Download UK & USA Bulk Email Lists
- Message 2002-09-0002: species names...
- Message 2002-09-0003: [unknown]
- Message 2002-09-0004: [unknown]
- Message 2002-09-0005: Top quality pix inside (it)
- Message 2002-09-0006: My nude pics! (X7D2w0)
- Message 2002-10-0001: Removes viruses from email messages (PQMYL5L4b)
- Message 2002-10-0002: Most men will have an isolated erection problem at some time= in their lives (QUeP233VuI)
- Message 2002-10-0003: Hello...?
- Message 2002-10-0004: Orthography (rather long)
- Message 2002-10-0005: Felicidades!!!!
- Message 2002-11-0001: Llamame, por favor!
- Message 2002-11-0002: do you have product to sell in the net ?(my email has change
- Message 2003-02-0001: To Phil Cantino, Mikael Thollesson, and Torsten Eriksson
- Message 2003-02-0002: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0003: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0004: Fwd: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0005: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0006: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0007: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0008: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0009: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0010: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0011: Re: Therizinosaur Nature
- Message 2003-02-0012: Fwd: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0013: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0014: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0015: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0016: "Qilongia" & chains across the phylogenetic grass
- Message 2003-02-0017: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0018: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0019: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0020: Re: "Qilongia" & chains across the phylogenetic grass
- Message 2003-02-0021: RE: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
- Message 2003-02-0022: what prevents us from establishing...
- Message 2003-02-0023: Re: what prevents us from establishing...
- Message 2003-02-0024: Re: what prevents us from establishing...
- Message 2003-02-0025: Art. 9.4
- Message 2003-02-0026: Re: what prevents us from establishing...
- Message 2003-02-0027: Note 9.4.1
- Message 2003-02-0028: Art. 20
- Message 2003-02-0029: Re: Note 9.4.1
- Message 2003-02-0030: RE: Note 9.4.1
- Message 2003-02-0031: Fwd: Re: what prevents us from establishing...
- Message 2003-02-0032: RE: Art. 20
- Message 2003-02-0033: Re: Art. 20
- Message 2003-02-0034: Re: Fwd: Re: what prevents us from establishing...
- Message 2003-02-0035: Fwd: Re: registration database
- Message 2003-03-0001: RE: Note 9.4.1
- Message 2003-03-0002: Re: Note 9.4.1
- Message 2003-03-0003: Re: Note 9.4.1
- Message 2003-03-0004: Re: Fwd: Animal 'bar codes' to take over from Latin names
- Message 2003-03-0005: Re: Animal 'bar codes' to take over from Latin names
- Message 2003-03-0006: Nomenclature symposium
- Message 2003-03-0007: HELLO
- Message 2003-04-0001: Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2003-04-0002: Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2003-04-0003: Felicidades!!! nbnbr
- Message 2003-04-0004: Re: Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2003-04-0005: A Harmless Method to Increase Your Bust Line 1hptJn=
- Message 2003-04-0006: =3D?gb2312?q?_3000=3DCD=3DF2=3DD3=3DCA=3DCF=3DE4=3DB5=3DD8=3DD6=3DB7=
- Message 2003-04-0007: =3D?gb2312?q?_3000=3DCD=3DF2=3DD3=3DCA=3DCF=3DE4=3DB5=3DD8=3DD6=3DB7=
- Message 2003-04-0008: FORIGNER IS NEEDED (BUSINESS PROPOSAL)
- Message 2003-04-0009: Italian-crafted Rolex - only $65 - $140!! Free SHIPPING!!
- Message 2003-04-0010: =3D?gb2312?q?_3000=3DCD=3DF2=3DD3=3DCA=3DCF=3DE4=3DB5=3DD8=3DD6=3DB7=
- Message 2003-05-0001: Re: Coelurosaur Phylogeny
- Message 2003-05-0002: spam reduction
- Message 2003-06-0001: Re: AFROTHERIA, CROWS & SPECIES CONCEPTS
- Message 2003-06-0002: Re: AFROTHERIA, CROWS & SPECIES CONCEPTS
- Message 2003-06-0003: Re: AFROTHERIA, CROWS & SPECIES CONCEPTS
- Message 2003-06-0004: RE: AFROTHERIA, CROWS & SPECIES CONCEPTS
- Message 2003-06-0005: Re: AFROTHERIA, CROWS & SPECIES CONCEPTS
- Message 2003-06-0006: Re: AFROTHERIA, CROWS & SPECIES CONCEPTS
- Message 2003-07-0001: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)
- Message 2003-07-0002: RE: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)
- Message 2003-07-0003: (no subject)
- Message 2003-07-0004: Tyrannosaurus stanwinstorum FMNH PR2081 = BHI 2033
- Message 2003-07-0005: RE: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)
- Message 2003-07-0006: Re: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)
- Message 2003-07-0007: Allosaurus whitei Pickering 1995, a revised online diagnosis, 13 July 2003
- Message 2003-07-0008: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting, second circular
- Message 2003-08-0001: phlyogenetic systematics/the PhyloCode -- new philosophical overview
- Message 2003-08-0002: Re: phlyogenetic systematics/the PhyloCode -- new philosophical overview
- Message 2003-08-0003: Re: Announcement: Second circular of the 1rst International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2003-08-0004: Re: Announcement: Second circular [...] [short!]
- Message 2003-08-0005: Two PhyloCode Questions
- Message 2003-09-0001: Phylocode Email Archive Back On-Line
- Message 2003-09-0002: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting, second circular
- Message 2003-10-0001: revised PhyloCode is available
- Message 2003-10-0002: Re: revised PhyloCode is available
- Message 2003-10-0003: Re: revised PhyloCode is available
- Message 2003-10-0004: Typos in Article 3 Example 1
- Message 2003-10-0005: And now my quarterly nitpicking...
- Message 2003-10-0006: Fwd: And now my quarterly nitpicking...
- Message 2003-10-0007: Re: And now my quarterly nitpicking...
- Message 2003-10-0008: Article 11 (and 13, and 17, and 18)
- Message 2003-10-0009: Articles 19 & 20, Table 1, Appendix A
- Message 2003-10-0010: Fwd: Article 11 (and 13, and 17, and 18)
- Message 2003-10-0011: Re: Article 11 (and 13, and 17, and 18), specifically Megalosaurus
- Message 2003-10-0012: Re: Article 11 (and 13, and 17, and 18)
- Message 2003-10-0013: Fwd: Re: synapomorphies
- Message 2003-10-0014: Fwd: Re: Article 11 (and 13, and 17, and 18)
- Message 2003-12-0001: Paris meeting registration
- Message 2003-12-0002: One more Recommendation?
- Message 2003-12-0003: Re: One more Recommendation?
- Message 2003-12-0004: Re: One more Recommendation?
- Message 2003-12-0005: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2003-12-0006: Re: One more Recommendation?
- Message 2003-12-0007: Re: One more Recommendation?
- Message 2003-12-0008: Re: One more Recommendation?
- Message 2003-12-0009: revised version of PhyloCode is online
- Message 2004-02-0001: Re: a comment on ancestors
- Message 2004-02-0002: Re: a comment on ancestors
- Message 2004-02-0003: Re: a comment on ancestors
- Message 2004-02-0004: Re: a comment on ancestors
- Message 2004-02-0005: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0006: Re: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0007: Fwd: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0008: Cladistics and the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-02-0009: on universaliy of Phylocode
- Message 2004-02-0010: Re: on universaliy of Phylocode
- Message 2004-02-0011: Re: on universaliy of Phylocode
- Message 2004-02-0012: question to moderator
- Message 2004-02-0013: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0014: Re: on universaliy of Phylocode
- Message 2004-02-0015: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0016: RE: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0017: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0018: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0019: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0020: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0021: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0022: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0023: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0024: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0025: Fwd: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0026: Re: RE: a comment on ancestor
- Message 2004-02-0027: proposal (Paris meeting)
- Message 2004-02-0028: proposal (Paris meeting)
- Message 2004-05-0001: lineages of true crabs
- Message 2004-05-0002: new thoughts proposed on the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-05-0003: Call for nominations, PN meeting
- Message 2004-05-0004: Cover illustration
- Message 2004-05-0005: another tiresome (and predictable) attack against phylogenetic systematics
- Message 2004-05-0006: Re: another tiresome (and predictable) attack against phylogenetic systematics
- Message 2004-05-0007: Talks in the First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-05-0008: Re: Talks in the First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0001: species
- Message 2004-06-0002: Re: species
- Message 2004-06-0003: When The PhyloCode is Implemented ...
- Message 2004-06-0004: Fwd: When The PhyloCode is Implemented ...
- Message 2004-06-0005: RE: When The PhyloCode is Implemented ...
- Message 2004-06-0006: criticism rising
- Message 2004-06-0007: Re: criticism rising
- Message 2004-06-0008: Anti-Phylogenetic Comments in The Botanical Review (part 1)
- Message 2004-06-0009: Anti-Phylogenetic Comments in The Botanical Review (part 2)
- Message 2004-06-0010: Re: Directions, PhyloCode Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0011: RE: LITU, and lineage names
- Message 2004-06-0012: RE: LITU, and lineage names
- Message 2004-06-0013: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0014: Yet one more proposal for a shorthand notation, and for an addition to Rec. 11A
- Message 2004-06-0015: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0016: Fw: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0017: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0018: Fw: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0019: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0020: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0021: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0022: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0023: RE: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0024: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0025: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0026: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0027: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0028: RE: Yet one more proposal for a shorthand notation
- Message 2004-06-0029: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting [amniote vertebrate clades]
- Message 2004-06-0030: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0031: Re: Yet one more proposal for a shorthand notation, and for an addition to Rec. 11A
- Message 2004-06-0032: Re: Yet one more proposal for a shorthand notation, and for an addition to Rec. 11A
- Message 2004-06-0033: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other
- Message 2004-06-0034: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0035: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0036: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0037: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0038: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0039: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0040: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0041: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0042: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0043: Recent Discussions
- Message 2004-06-0044: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0045: Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0046: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
- Message 2004-06-0047: change in Rec. 10A
- Message 2004-06-0048: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting
- Message 2004-06-0049: Re: Yet one more proposal for a shorthand notation, and for an addition to Rec. 11A
- Message 2004-08-0001: Walter Bock on the term "species" (concept, category, & taxon)
- Message 2004-08-0002: update on PhyloCode web site
- Message 2004-08-0003: Re: update on PhyloCode web site
- Message 2004-08-0004: companion volume to PhyloCode
- Message 2004-08-0005: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other
- Message 2004-08-0006: Re: Registration
- Message 2004-08-0007: Fwd: Re: Registration
- Message 2004-08-0008: Re: Registration
- Message 2004-08-0009: Intercode homonyms (was Re: Registration)
- Message 2004-08-0010: Re: Intercode homonyms (was Re: Registration)
- Message 2004-08-0011: Panstems
- Message 2004-08-0012: RE: Ichthyornis paper
- Message 2004-10-0001: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0002: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0003: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0004: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0005: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0006: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0007: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0008: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0009: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0010: Fwd: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other
- Message 2004-10-0011: Fwd: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other
- Message 2004-10-0012: Re: Registration
- Message 2004-10-0013: Re: Registration
- Message 2004-10-0014: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0015: RE: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0016: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0017: Re: Fwd: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other
- Message 2004-10-0018: Re: Registration
- Message 2004-10-0019: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0020: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0021: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0022: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0023: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0024: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
- Message 2004-10-0025: Another Possible Problem with Naming Conventions for Panstem=
- Message 2004-10-0026: Re: Another Possible Problem with Naming Conventions for Pan=
- Message 2004-10-0027: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0028: Re: Panstems [NOTE ON REC 10A]
- Message 2004-10-0029: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Nomenclatural Freedom
- Message 2004-10-0030: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
- Message 2004-10-0031: Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
- Message 2004-10-0032: Fwd: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0033: Fwd: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other
- Message 2004-10-0034: Fwd: Re: Another Possible Problem with Naming Conventions fo=
- Message 2004-10-0035: Re: Re: Another Possible Problem with Naming Conventions for Panstem/Crown Pairs
- Message 2004-10-0036: "Qilongia"'s continuing Disneyization of scientific discours=
- Message 2004-10-0037: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0038: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0039: Re: "Qilongia"'s continuing Disneyization of scientific disc=
- Message 2004-10-0040: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0041: Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
- Message 2004-10-0042: Re: "Qilongia"'s continuing Disneyization of scientific disc=
- Message 2004-10-0043: Thoughts on the Paris meeting
- Message 2004-10-0044: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0045: New Scientist article on the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0046: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0047: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0048: Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
- Message 2004-10-0049: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0050: Nomenclatural Freedom
- Message 2004-10-0051: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0052: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0053: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0054: Phylogenetic Notation (was: Panstems)
- Message 2004-10-0055: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0056: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0057: Nomenclatural Freedom IS the issue
- Message 2004-10-0058: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0059: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0060: Re: Fwd: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0061: Re: Fwd: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0062: Re: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0063: "Qilongia", nomenclature, taxonomy
- Message 2004-10-0064: In case anyone was wondering
- Message 2004-10-0065: Re: In case anyone was wondering
- Message 2004-10-0066: Re: "Qilongia", nomenclature, taxonomy
- Message 2004-10-0067: Re: Fwd: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0068: ISPN, CPN, and Companion Volume
- Message 2004-10-0069: Re: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0070: RE: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0071: Re: In case anyone was wondering
- Message 2004-10-0072: Re: ISPN, CPN, and Companion Volume
- Message 2004-10-0073: Re: Thoughts on the Paris meeting
- Message 2004-10-0074: Re: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0075: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0076: Paleontology [was: Re: Thoughts on the Paris meeting]
- Message 2004-10-0077: RE: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0078: Re: In case anyone was wondering
- Message 2004-10-0079: Re: ISPN, CPN, and Companion Volume
- Message 2004-10-0080: RE: Paleontology [was: Re: Thoughts on the Paris meeting]
- Message 2004-10-0081: Re: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0082: Fwd: Re: In case anyone was wondering
- Message 2004-10-0083: Re: Thoughts on the Paris meeting
- Message 2004-10-0084: The Pancompromise?
- Message 2004-10-0085: Re: The Pancompromise?
- Message 2004-10-0086: Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0087: Re: The Pancompromise?
- Message 2004-10-0088: Re: Fwd: Re: In case anyone was wondering
- Message 2004-10-0089: Re: Apomorphy-based clades; was Re: Panstems
- Message 2004-10-0090: Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
- Message 2004-10-0091: Re: The Pancompromise?
- Message 2004-10-0092: Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
- Message 2004-10-0093: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0094: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0095: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0096: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0097: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0098: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0099: Re: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0100: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0101: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0102: Re: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0103: Re: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0104: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0105: Re: Phylogenetic Notation
- Message 2004-10-0106: Fwd: Re: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0107: Fwd: Re: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0108: Re: Re: Rec. 10A and panstem names
- Message 2004-10-0109: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0110: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0111: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0112: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0113: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0114: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0115: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0116: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0117: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0118: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0119: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0120: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0121: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0122: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0123: References for Papers Using PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0124: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0125: Fwd: References for Papers Using PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0126: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0127: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0128: Plant clade names was PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0129: Accidentally deleted e-mails...
- Message 2004-10-0130: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonym=
- Message 2004-10-0131: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0132: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0133: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0134: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0135: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonym=
- Message 2004-10-0136: Internet Citation Concerns (Was: References for Papers Using= PhyloCode)
- Message 2004-10-0137: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - aut=
- Message 2004-10-0138: Re: Internet Citation Concerns
- Message 2004-10-0139: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - aut=
- Message 2004-10-0140: info
- Message 2004-10-0141: Fwd: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X =
- Message 2004-10-0142: Re: Fwd: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICL=
- Message 2004-10-0143: Re: Fwd: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICL=
- Message 2004-10-0144: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
- Message 2004-10-0145: Re: Lumping Spinosauridae Redux
- Message 2004-10-0146: Re: Lumping Spinosauridae Redux
- Message 2004-10-0147: Re: Lumping Spinosauridae Redux
- Message 2004-10-0148: Fetching Email Archives
- Message 2004-10-0149: RE: Fetching Email Archives
- Message 2004-10-0150: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode [was: Re: Lumping Spinosa=
- Message 2004-10-0151: Re: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode [was: Re: Lumping Spi=
- Message 2004-10-0152: Re: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0153: Fw: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0154: Re: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0155: Re: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode [was: Re: Lumping Spi=
- Message 2004-10-0156: Re: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0157: Re: Monotypic genera and the PhyloCode
- Message 2004-10-0158: unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0159: Art. 11.5
- Message 2004-10-0160: Re: unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0161: unsubscribe phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0162: unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0163: Unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0164: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
- Message 2004-10-0165: Fwd: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
- Message 2004-10-0166: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
- Message 2004-10-0167: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
- Message 2004-10-0168: unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0169: unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0170: unsubscribe
- Message 2004-10-0171: Re: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
- Message 2004-10-0172: Re: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
- Message 2004-10-0173: Mention of the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0174: Re: Mention of the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0175: RE: Mention of the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0176: Re: Mention of the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0177: RE: Mention of the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0178: use of vernacular names
- Message 2004-10-0179: Re: use of vernacular names
- Message 2004-10-0180: Re: Mention of the Phylocode
- Message 2004-10-0181: Fwd: Re: use of vernacular names
- Message 2004-10-0182: RE: Re: use of vernacular names
- Message 2004-10-0183: applying widely known names to crown clades
- Message 2004-10-0184: crown clade convention
- Message 2004-10-0185: RE: crown clade convention
- Message 2004-10-0186: Re: crown clade convention (long)
- Message 2004-10-0187: short combined answer
- Message 2004-10-0188: Re: RE: crown clade convention
- Message 2004-10-0189: RE: RE: crown clade convention
- Message 2004-10-0190: Re: crown clade convention (long)
- Message 2004-10-0191: Re: RE: RE: crown clade convention
- Message 2004-10-0192: Re: crown clade convention (long)
- Message 2004-10-0193: Re: crown clade convention (long)
- Message 2004-10-0194: Highly imprecise name uses in a neontological paper
- Message 2004-10-0195: Death of the PhyloCode?
- Message 2004-10-0196: Article 5
- Message 2004-10-0197: Re: Article 5
- Message 2004-10-0198: Re: Article 5
- Message 2004-10-0199: Re: Article 5
- Message 2004-10-0200: Re: Article 5
- Message 2005-01-0001: Re: Death of the PhyloCode?
- Message 2005-01-0002: RE: Death of the PhyloCode?
- Message 2005-05-0001: Comments on the Preamble
- Message 2005-05-0002: autonymous affixes
- Message 2005-05-0003: Article 11.8
- Message 2005-05-0004: Re: Article 11.8
- Message 2005-05-0005: Now online: Critique of Benton's (2000) "critique" of the Ph=
- Message 2005-05-0006: Re: Now online: Critique of Benton's (2000) "critique" of th=
- Message 2005-05-0007: Re: Thanks :)
- Message 2005-05-0008: Re: Thanks :)
- Message 2005-05-0009: Re: Thank you!
- Message 2005-05-0010: Fwd: Re: Article 11.8
- Message 2005-05-0011: Re: Hi
- Message 2005-05-0012: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0013: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0014: RE:PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0015: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0016: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0017: RE:PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0018: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0019: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0020: Fw: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0021: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0022: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0023: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0024: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0025: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0026: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0027: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0028: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0029: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0030: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0031: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0032: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0033: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0034: RE:PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0035: re: phylocode
- Message 2005-05-0036: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0037: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0038: PhyloCode in Cladistics
- Message 2005-05-0039: Re: PhyloCode in Cladistics
- Message 2005-05-0040: Recent modifications of the Code?
- Message 2005-05-0041: Re: Recent modifications of the Code?
- Message 2005-05-0042: Fwd: Re: Recent modifications of the Code?
- Message 2005-05-0043: PhyloCode and Dictionaries
- Message 2005-05-0044: Fw: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0045: Re: PhyloCode
- Message 2005-05-0046: No Postings?
- Message 2005-05-0047: Re: No Postings?
- Message 2005-05-0048: Pickett's paper comments wanted
- Message 2005-05-0049: Re: Pickett's paper comments wanted
- Message 2005-05-0050: Re: Pickett's paper comments wanted
- Message 2005-05-0051: Pickett's charge
- Message 2005-05-0052: Re: Pickett's charge
- Message 2005-05-0053: proofreading needed
- Message 2005-06-0001: [unknown]
- Message 2005-06-0002: FW: Pickett's charge
- Message 2005-06-0003: species under PhyloCode
- Message 2005-06-0004: Re: species under PhyloCode
- Message 2005-06-0005: Re: species under PhyloCode
- Message 2005-06-0006: In Press Article...
- Message 2005-08-0001: Species Names in PN
- Message 2005-08-0002: Re: Species Names in PN
- Message 2005-08-0003: Re: Species Names in PN
- Message 2005-08-0004: Fwd: Great example of the problems with redundant codes
- Message 2005-08-0005: Re: Aliwalia [from Adam Yates]
- Message 2005-08-0006: short paper in American Scientist
- Message 2005-08-0007: Dick Olmstead's message/Articles in American Scientist
- Message 2005-08-0008: pdfs of articles
- Message 2005-08-0009: web repository
- Message 2005-08-0010: Re: web repository
- Message 2005-08-0011: 3D Phylogenetic Model
- Message 2005-08-0012: Fwd: Dick Olmstead's message/Articles in American Scientist
- Message 2005-12-0001: Must read!
- Message 2005-12-0002: Fw: Must read!
- Message 2005-12-0003: Minor rewordings of Article 17?
- Message 2005-12-0004: Re: Minor rewordings of Article 17?
- Message 2005-12-0005: Fw: Minor rewordings of Article 17?
- Message 2005-12-0006: Minor Rewordings of Article 7?
- Message 2005-12-0007: Re: Minor Rewordings of Article 7?
- Message 2005-12-0008: Art. 17.1
- Message 2005-12-0009: second ISPN meeting June 29 - July 2, 2006
- Message 2005-12-0010: Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Diplodocoidea (Dinosauria: Sauropod=
- Message 2005-12-0011: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa
- Message 2005-12-0012: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa
- Message 2005-12-0013: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa
- Message 2005-12-0014: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki
- Message 2005-12-0015: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa
- Message 2005-12-0016: =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_Stormbergia_dangershoeki,_new_Early_Jurassic_or=
- Message 2005-12-0017: Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki
- Message 2005-12-0018: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa
- Message 2005-12-0019: Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki
- Message 2005-12-0020: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa
- Message 2005-12-0021: Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki
- Message 2005-12-0022: Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki
- Message 2005-12-0023: =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_Stormbergia_dangershoeki,_new_Early_Jurassic_or=
- Message 2005-12-0024: BioCode and PhyloCode conflicts
- Message 2005-12-0025: Fwd: Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangersho=
- Message 2005-12-0026: Re: BioCode and PhyloCode conflicts
- Message 2005-12-0027: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0028: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0029: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0030: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0031: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0032: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0033: Fwd: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0034: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0035: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0036: Re: Fwd: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0037: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume? (short!)
- Message 2005-12-0038: International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature
- Message 2005-12-0039: Repost: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0040: Repost: Proposal about names with prefixes (and suffixes?)
- Message 2005-12-0041: Phylocode and Evolution
- Message 2005-12-0042: Re: Phylocode and Evolution
- Message 2005-12-0043: Re: Phylocode and Evolution
- Message 2005-12-0044: Re: Phylocode and Evolution
- Message 2005-12-0045: Re: Phylocode and Evolution
- Message 2005-12-0046: Re: Phylocode and Evolution
- Message 2005-12-0047: We could be even Martians
- Message 2005-12-0048: Fw: Re: Repost: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0049: Descendents of a species
- Message 2005-12-0050: Re: Descendents of a species
- Message 2005-12-0051: Species definition
- Message 2005-12-0052: Re: Species definition
- Message 2005-12-0053: Re: Repost: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0054: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0055: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0056: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0057: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0058: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0059: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0060: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0061: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0062: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0063: Re: Repost: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
- Message 2005-12-0064: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0065: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0066: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0067: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0068: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0069: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0070: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0071: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0072: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
- Message 2005-12-0073: PhyloCode: The definition of evolution
- Message 2005-12-0074: Re: PhyloCode: The definition of evolution
- Message 2005-12-0075: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0076: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0077: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0078: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0079: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0080: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0081: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0082: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0083: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0084: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno05
- Message 2005-12-0085: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno's (2005) new definitions
- Message 2005-12-0086: Re: PhyloCode: Re: Sereno's (2005) new definitions
- Message 2006-01-0001: PhyloCode: Senter, 2005 and the definition of _Aves_
- Message 2006-01-0002: Re: PhyloCode: Senter, 2005 and the definition of _Aves_
- Message 2006-01-0003: PhyloCode: How much will the Committee have to do?
- Message 2006-01-0004: Fwd: PhyloCode: How much will the Committee have to do?
- Message 2006-01-0005: Re: PhyloCode: Senter, 2005 and the definition of _Aves_
- Message 2006-01-0006: PhyloCode: The origin of life perhaps a few times over
- Message 2006-01-0007: Re: PhyloCode: The origin of life perhaps a few times over
- Message 2006-01-0008: Re: PhyloCode: The origin of life perhaps a few times over
- Message 2006-01-0009: Re: PhyloCode: The origin of life perhaps a few times over
- Directory misc -