[Previous by date - Re: One more Recommendation?]
[Next by date - First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting]
[Previous by subject - Re: One more Recommendation?]
[Next by subject - Re: One more Recommendation?]
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:46:05 -0500
From: Kevin de Queiroz <Dequeiroz.Kevin@NMNH.SI.EDU>
Subject: Re: One more Recommendation?
Such a recommendation would have to specify that the naming forming the root is a preexisting name. >>> David Marjanovic <email@example.com> - 12/3/03 4:50 PM >>> I forgot: The following should be added to the Recommendation (or form one of its own, whatever): >> Names formed by adding a prefix to another name should only be defined if the latter is already an established name. << So no Eupelycosauria when there is no Pelycosauria, and no Eureptilia when there is no Reptilia. (Currently Eureptilia, Reptilia, and Eupelycosauria have phylogenetic definitions, while Pelycosauria has none.)