[Previous by date - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Next by date - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Previous by subject - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Next by subject - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: [unknown]
To: jonathan.r.wagner@mail.utexas.edu, phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.ed=
Subject: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
Jon Wagner (jonathan.r.wagner@mail.utexas.edu) wrote: <ARTICLE X: AUTONYMS> wow ... now if only I was a voting member of the board that could actually determine the PhyloCode, I'd say ... "yea" ... :) I very muc= h like this idea. The few "legalistic" changes do not affect the struct= ure, the examples are clear, etc. I am even, contra my previous impression= s of using hyphens, quite pleased at this structure and usage; separate cataloguing also prevents confusion over issues of priority for peopl= e doing searches for established definitional nomenclature, and this is= also preferred. I must hand it to you, Jon :) Cheers, =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Jaime A. Headden Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to mak= ing leaps in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to = do. We should all learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world arou= nd us rather than zoom by it. "Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969) =09 =09=09 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail=20