[Previous by date - Species Names in PN]
[Next by date - Re: Species Names in PN]
[Previous by subject - Re: Repost: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by subject - Re: Species Names in PN]
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:38:06 -0700
From: Matt Haber <mhhaber@ucdavis.edu>
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Species Names in PN
I would recommend Dayrat et al, 2004, "Suggestions for a new species nomenclature.", Taxon 53(2): 493-99. On Jul 20, 2005, at 2:55 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: > Have there been any follow-ups to the Cantino et al. 1999 paper that > considered thirteen different approaches to handling species names in > phylogenetic nomenclature? I can't think of any. > > Cantino, Philip D., Harold N. Bryant, Kevin de Queiroz, > Michael J. Donoghue, Torsten Eriksson, David M. Hillis & > Michael S. Y. Lee. 1999. Species Names in Phylogenetic > Nomenclature. Systematic Biology 48(4):790-807. > > _/|_ > ___________________________________________________________________ > /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> > http://www.miketaylor.org.uk > )_v__/\ "She's not the only one we'll have betrayed" -- Schoenberg & > Boublil, "The Fall of Saigon" > > -- > Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio > http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/ >