Message 2005-08-0002: Re: Species Names in PN

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:38:06 -0700

[Previous by date - Species Names in PN]
[Next by date - Re: Species Names in PN]
[Previous by subject - Re: Repost: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by subject - Re: Species Names in PN]

Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:38:06 -0700
From: Matt Haber <mhhaber@ucdavis.edu>
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Species Names in PN

I would recommend Dayrat et al, 2004, "Suggestions for a new species 
nomenclature.", Taxon 53(2): 493-99.

On Jul 20, 2005, at 2:55 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:

> Have there been any follow-ups to the Cantino et al. 1999 paper that
> considered thirteen different approaches to handling species names in
> phylogenetic nomenclature?  I can't think of any.
>
> 	Cantino, Philip D., Harold N. Bryant, Kevin de Queiroz,
> 	Michael J. Donoghue, Torsten Eriksson, David M. Hillis &
> 	Michael S. Y. Lee.  1999.  Species Names in Phylogenetic
> 	Nomenclature.  Systematic Biology 48(4):790-807.
>
>  _/|_	 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> /o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <mike@miketaylor.org.uk>  
> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
> )_v__/\  "She's not the only one we'll have betrayed" -- Schoenberg &
> 	 Boublil, "The Fall of Saigon"
>
> --
> Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
> 	http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/
>

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!