Message 2005-05-0039: Re: PhyloCode in Cladistics

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:48:06 +0100

[Previous by date - PhyloCode in Cladistics]
[Next by date - Recent modifications of the Code?]
[Previous by subject - Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Next by subject - Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]

Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:48:06 +0100
From: [unknown]
To: PML <>, DML <>
Subject: Re: PhyloCode in Cladistics

>  Pickett, K. M. 2005. The new and improved PhyloCode, now with type=
>    ranks, and even polyphyly: a conference report from the First=
> International
>    Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting. _Cladistics_ 21(1): [posted o=
>    before print, no page numbers] (doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.000=

I can't read the article (it isn't for free)... so I can only wonder =
Pickett has stayed in the pubs with us for too long. (Was he even the=
~:-| -- Well. Ranks are allowed, but not mandatory, in every version =
of the=20
draft PhyloCode I've seen so far; non-holophyletic taxa must still no=
t be=20
named; and types... does he mean specimens as specifiers?=20


Feedback to <> is welcome!