[Previous by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Previous by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:31:16 +0200 (MEST)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Cc: jonathan.r.wagner@mail.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
> > 5. After the nomenclature of a part of the tree has been set in > > stone in this way, anyone can name newly discovered clades in tha= t > > part and can immediately register them durably. > > I'm not sure I agree with this part. And if we restrict it to new (as opposed to converted) names? Do you = agree=20 then? :-) --=20 Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch? NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie