Message 2005-12-0029: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:31:16 +0200 (MEST)

[Previous by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Previous by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:31:16 +0200 (MEST)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Cc: jonathan.r.wagner@mail.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?

> > 5. After the nomenclature of a part of the tree has been set in
> > stone in this way, anyone can name newly discovered clades in tha=
t
> > part and can immediately register them durably.
>
> I'm not sure I agree with this part.

And if we restrict it to new (as opposed to converted) names? Do you =
agree=20
then? :-)

--=20
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!