[Previous by date - Re: Panstems]
[Next by date - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Nomenclatural Freedom]
[Previous by subject - Re: Panstems]
[Next by subject - Re: PhyloCode]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:46:35 -0500
From: [unknown]
To: Kevin de Queiroz <Dequeiroz.Kevin@NMNH.SI.EDU>
Cc: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Panstems [NOTE ON REC 10A]
At 03:05 PM 9/9/04, Kevin de Queiroz wrote: >Similarly, the PhyloCode contains a recommendation (10A), which Phil= and I=20 >are going to propose be modified and made into a rule, For the record, the use of Panstems violates the letter and the spiri= t of=20 Recommendation 10A: "When establishing the name of a clade, a preexis= ting=20 name that has been applied to this clade should generally be selected= if=20 such a name exists." If this is to be made a rule within the PhyloCod= e,=20 substantial alteration will have to occur. Naturally, I support makin= g it a=20 rule as it stands. Jon