Message 2004-10-0028: Re: Panstems [NOTE ON REC 10A]

Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:46:35 -0500

[Previous by date - Re: Panstems]
[Next by date - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Nomenclatural Freedom]
[Previous by subject - Re: Panstems]
[Next by subject - Re: PhyloCode]

Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:46:35 -0500
From: [unknown]
To: Kevin de Queiroz <Dequeiroz.Kevin@NMNH.SI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Panstems [NOTE ON REC 10A]

At 03:05 PM 9/9/04, Kevin de Queiroz wrote:
>Similarly, the PhyloCode contains a recommendation (10A), which Phil=
 and I=20
>are going to propose be modified and made into a rule,

For the record, the use of Panstems violates the letter and the spiri=
t of=20
Recommendation 10A: "When establishing the name of a clade, a preexis=
name that has been applied to this clade should generally be selected=
such a name exists." If this is to be made a rule within the PhyloCod=
substantial alteration will have to occur. Naturally, I support makin=
g it a=20
rule as it stands.



Feedback to <> is welcome!