[Previous by date - Panstems]
[Next by date - Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=]
[Previous by subject - RE: Genus names]
[Next by subject - RE: LITU, and lineage names]
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <mightyodinn@yahoo.com>
To: Mailing List - Dinosaur <dinosaur@usc.edu>, Mailing List - PhyloCode <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Cc: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Ichthyornis paper
(crossposted to the PhyloCode Mailing List) --- Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com> wrote: > The Pan- prefix is mandated by the PhyloCode for stem clades. Thus, the > erection of Pangalliformes was inevitable. No, it isn't mentioned in the draft PhyloCode anywhere; it's simply a convention (for panstem clades, not just any stem-based clade) that some have been putting forward. It has certain plusses and certain minuses (see my last full post to the PhyloCode Mailing List). ===== =====> T. Michael Keesey <http://dino.lm.com/contact> =====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com> =====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze> ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail