[Previous by date - Fwd: Re: My classification of coelurosaurs]
[Next by date - Stepping back]
[Previous by subject - RE: Reply to Jacques Gauthier re: reprints]
[Next by subject - RE: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)]
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:35:51 -0400
From: "Moore, Gerry" <gerrymoore@bbg.org>
To: 'Scott Redhead' <redheads@EM.AGR.CA>, PhyloCode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: RE: S. Redhead's recent posts
SR: Recent discussions have revealed how much discord there is even between participants on this listserv. Virtually nobody refers to specific articles in the draft PhyloCode. Really? I began a thread last year titled "Art. 10.1"? In fact there have been several threads that have dealt with specific articles or that have proposed new articles or recommendations (check out the archives). True the most recent posts have not, but it is incorrect to state that "virtually nobody" has referred to specific articles. As for the discord, it is a listserv dealing with a controversial topic where people hold a wide range of views on the topic. It isn't some love-in where only one view only is espoused (that would be dull). Cheers, Gerry Gerry Moore Research Taxonomist Brooklyn Botanic Garden 1000 Washington Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11225-1099 718-623-7332