[Previous by date - Rankless classifications]
[Next by date - Crown groups]
[Previous by subject - Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=]
[Next by subject - Re: Re: Another Possible Problem with Naming Conventions for Panstem/Crown Pairs]
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 21:59:04 -0600 (CST)
From: "Jonathan R. Wagner" <znc14@TTACS.TTU.EDU>
To: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Cc: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Rankless classifications
At 12:15 AM 6/4/01 +0200, you wrote:
>The first -idae within an -idae: Look at the cladogram in
>http://www.pterosaurs.net/Pterosaur_Phylogeny.html
For the record, this one is in print (not on the allmighty Web), but
not published:
Wagner, J. R. 2001. The hadrosaurian dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Hadrosauria)
of Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas, with implications for
Late Cretaceous paleozoogeography. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Texas Tech
University. xvi + 417 pp.
The specific case is Saurolophidae (n. comb.), which is included
within Hadrosauridae. I almost nested a genus between a genus, but held off
(for now). It really isn't worth ILLing... I'll publish the nomenclature
soon enough anyway. For trivia buffs, to my knowledge, this is the only
thesis from TTU to ever incorporate Phylogenetic Nomenclature... a point not
lost on the author's committee.
Wagner
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan R. Wagner, - IN TRANSIT - inquire at the University of Texas at Austin
"Why do I sense we've picked up another pathetic lifeform?" - Obi-Wan Kenobi