Message 2004-10-0167: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:50:18 -0400

[Previous by date - Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes]
[Next by date - unsubscribe]
[Previous by subject - Fwd: Re: GALTONIA THE FLOWER]
[Next by subject - Fwd: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X =]

Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:50:18 -0400
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes

>
>--- Philip Cantino <cantino@ohiou.edu> wrote:
>
>>  The problem you perceive disappears if you think
>>  of Ficus L. 1753 and Ficus R. 1798 as different
>>  names that happen to be spelled the same way,
>>  rather than the same name.  This is consistent
>>  with the definition of homonym in the PhyloCode
>>  glossary.  Which type you use as an internal
>>  specifier depends on which name you are
>>  converting.  If you are converting Ficus L. 1753
>>  as the name of a clade of plants, you would use
>>  the type specimen of that name as an internal
>>  specifier.  If you are converting Ficus R. 1798
>>  as the name of a clade of snails, you would use
>>  its type as an internal specifier.
>

Michael Keesey wrote:

>But homonyms may not be given equal precedence under the Phylocode:
>
>"13.3. If two or more definitions have been established for=20
>identically spelled
>names, the only acceptable name (i.e., the combination of name and d=
efinition;
>see Note 12.1.1) is the first one established under this code. A=
=20
>later homonym,
>unless conserved, is not an acceptable name of any taxon."
>
>Thus, if _Ficus_ were defined using the the snail species, any later=
=20
>attempt to
>define a clade named _Ficus_ using the fig species would not be acce=
pted
>(unless conserved, in which case the snail-based taxon becomes unacc=
epted).
>

This is correct.  Conversion of Ficus for a clade of snails would=
=20
prevent subsequent conversion of Ficus for a clade of plants.  If=
=20
this were to occur, a new name Phytoficus might be selected for the=
=20
plant clade.  Alternatively, because Ficus is a very well known name,=
=20
one could propose that the CPN conserve Ficus for the plant clade,=
=20
and the snail clade would have to be renamed.

Phil


--=20
Philip D. Cantino
Professor and Associate Chair
Department of Environmental and Plant Biology
Ohio University
Athens, OH 45701-2979
U.S.A.

Phone: (740) 593-1128; 593-1126
Fax: (740) 593-1130
e-mail: cantino@ohio.edu

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!