[Previous by date - Benton's paper]
[Next by date - Aesthetic Note (semi-humorous)]
[Previous by subject - RE: Art. 20]
[Next by subject - RE: Death of the PhyloCode?]
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:18:38 -0600
From: "Bryant, Harold MACH" <HBryant@mach.gov.sk.ca>
To: PhyloCode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: RE: Benton's paper
Michel, I agree with most of your comments regarding Benton's paper, and most of these concerns are commented on in the manuscript that Phil Cantino and I are working on. Our paper is a broader treatment of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature that deals also with issues raised by others, but it will certainly state our position regarding the major issues and misconceptions in Benton's paper. I would greatly appreciate a copy of your 1998 paper that you cite in your message. Thanks. I certainly received your comment on Nathan Wilson's question, and so did others because your email was commented on in a favourable light by Gerry Moore. Best wishes, Harold ------------------------------------------------------ Harold Bryant 2340 Albert Street Royal Saskatchewan Museum Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3V7 Canada