[Previous by date - Re: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes]
[Next by date - Mention of the Phylocode]
[Previous by subject - Re: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes]
[Next by subject - Re: Fwd: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICL=]
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 23:39:49 +0200
To: PML <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes
> Okay, the situation does seem to be covered, then. Indeed. I had suggested to take the meanings of such names under consideratio= n if there is one (like for *Ficus* -- and not for *Galtonia*). But this preassumes that both the clam and the tree names will be converted, a= nd I shouldn't do that. If the clam name will be converted and the tree na= me will not be, then the etymology will have to be ignored in any case. So I = retract that proposal.