[Previous by date - Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Next by date - Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Previous by subject - Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Next by subject - Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:40:31 +0100 (MET)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
> How about accepting the last part for Species for PhyloCode:Individ= ual > groups whose members are diverging from one another towards separat= e > species if not prevented from doing so. Sounds vague enough? It's circular. It defines "species" using "species". But anyway, I think agreeing on one species concept is far from an ur= gent=20 problem. Let's concentrate on the clades first. Maybe the use of spec= ies=20 will simply fade away for asexual organisms and fossils once the Phyl= oCode=20 is up and running. --=20 Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko! Satte Provisionen f=FCr GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner