[Previous by date - Systematics Association Annual Meeting]
[Next by date - Laurin, 2001-- Phylogenetic Taxonomy]
[Previous by subject - Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)]
[Next by subject - Yet one more proposal for a shorthand notation, and for an addition to Rec. 11A]
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 12:44:51 +0100
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
To: PhyloCode mailing list <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (short)
I think it's great we've apparently reached a consensus on the language issue, but nobody has yet answered to the other points I made in my original post: - treating all diacritic signs like diaereses in Art. 17.1 http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/art17.html, - dropping the special rules for dissertations and other theses because many dissertations, as well as maybe allowing publication otherwise as "in ink on paper" as ICZN now does, in Art. 4.2 http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/art4-5.html. Any discussion is appreciated :-)