[Previous by date - Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting]
[Next by date - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
[Previous by subject - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
[Next by subject - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:52:31 +0200
From: David Marjanovic <email@example.com>
To: DML <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: PML <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
> > (*Oplosaurus* exists, though only in synonymy lists.) > > Synonymous with what? The only older sauropod genus from Early Cretaceous > Europe is Pelorosaurus (assuming oxoniensis is made the neotype of > Cetiosaurus by the ICZN), and it's not comparable AND from the Hastings > Beds, not the Upper Weald Clay. I see no reason to assume Oplosaurus is a > synonym of Pelorosaurus. > > Mickey Mortimer Oopsie. I forgot what it was -- one of the numerous non-synonyms of *Pelorosaurus*...