[Previous by date - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
[Next by date - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
[Previous by subject - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
[Next by subject - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:54:46 +0200
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
To: PML <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>, DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 7:03 AM > Crown clade names shall include a contained clade name with Corono- > preceeding them. Why not Neo-? Is much shorter. > Stem clade names shall include a contained clade name with Clado- or > Stirpso- preceeding them. If, then Stirpo-; the -s of stirps is an ending. > Node clade names shall include a contained clade name with Ramoso- > preceeding them. Ramosus? Branchy? > Lineage-segment clade names shall include a contained clade name with > Genu- preceeding them. Why "knee"? > Now, let's have some fun. If you want to name a clade and have it > require an easy mnemonic form of a name, use the system logically and > apply it to all forms of clade names for utility. I think this is the > start of a new rash of possibilities. Yes. <headache> Was a joke, right?