[Previous by date - Re: current usage (blunt talk)]
[Next by date - Re: current usage (blunt talk)]
[Previous by subject - Re: current usage (blunt talk)]
[Next by subject - Re: current usage (blunt talk)]
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 12:49:59 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Alastair G. B. Simpson" <simpson@hades.biochem.dal.ca>
To: Michel Laurin <laurin@ccr.jussieu.fr>
Cc: PhyloCode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: current usage (blunt talk)
Michel Laurin wrote: ......I have not seen a backlash against cladistics because of the new meanings that we give to many names, although I admit that a few people don't like this. But these are mostly people who don't like cladistics anyway (and they are systematists), so I don't expect them to like the Phylocode... I am a (eukaryotic) microbiologist, and inhabit a world where "cladist" is generally used as an insult. As I read the phylocode, it should be acceptable to people who think parsimony analyses of anything are a waste of time, but who nonetheless want an efficient code for classification. I wouldn't give up on converting 'cladistics-haters' to Phylocode. Alastair Alastair G.B. Simpson, PhD Laboratories of Andrew Roger and Ford Doolittle, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Room 8B, Sir Charles Tupper Medical Building, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4H7, Canada. Phone: 902 494 2881 (Country code 1) Fax: 902 494 1355 (Country code 1) Email: simpson@hades.biochem.dal.ca