[Previous by date - Cladistics and the PhyloCode]
[Next by date - Re: on universaliy of Phylocode]
[Previous by subject - new thoughts proposed on the PhyloCode]
[Next by subject - pdfs of articles]
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:31:35 +0300
From: "Igor Ya. Pavlinov" <igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru>
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: on universaliy of Phylocode
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_RwNYt2vFeW+RCzFBKTsVHA) Content-type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable In several responces on my last communication, an idea occurs that = Phylogode is designed for cladists and that those non-cladist guys = disagree with it are free to go their own way. OK, it looks like a = special kind of plurality in science which I like very much and even = published a paper entitled "It is normal for the classificatory = approaches to be diversed". But does such a nomenclatorial pluralism = presumes that several Codes of nomenclature are allowed to rule over = taxonomic community? Suppose rigorous cladists (of whatever school) will = reject the International Code and will adopt the Phylocode on one of the = Willi Hennig society meetings - then what about unity of taxonomic = language in general and nomenclature stability in particular?=20 Igor P.S. A quesion to the moderator: will you please explane if a responce = to a comment came from a particular e-mail address woulld circulate over = all forum participants? - - -=20 Dr. Igor Ya. Pavlinov Chief, Division of Mammals Zoological Museum Moscow M.V.Lomonosov State University ul. Bol. Nikitskya, 6 125009 Moscow Russia Tel.: (095)2032940 Fax: (095)2032717 E-mail: igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru =20 --Boundary_(ID_RwNYt2vFeW+RCzFBKTsVHA) Content-type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dkoi8-r" http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>In several responces on my last=20 communication, an idea occurs that Phylogode is designed for cladists = and that=20 those non-cladist guys disagree with it are free to go their own way. = OK, it=20 looks like a special kind of plurality in science which I like very much = and=20 even published a paper entitled "It is normal for the classificatory = approaches=20 to be diversed". </FONT><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>But does such = a=20 nomenclatorial pluralism presumes that several Codes of nomenclature are = allowed=20 to rule over taxonomic community? Suppose rigorous cladists (of whatever = school)=20 will reject the International Code and will adopt the Phylocode on = one of=20 the Willi Hennig society meetings -</FONT><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" = size=3D2>=20 then what about unity of taxonomic language in general and nomenclature=20 stability in particular? </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>Igor</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>P.S. A quesion to the moderator: = will you=20 please explane if a responce to a comment came from a particular e-mail = address=20 woulld circulate over all forum participants?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>- - - <BR>Dr. Igor Ya. = Pavlinov<BR>Chief,=20 Division of Mammals<BR>Zoological Museum<BR>Moscow M.V.Lomonosov State=20 University<BR>ul. Bol. Nikitskya, 6<BR>125009 Moscow<BR>Russia<BR>Tel.:=20 (095)2032940<BR>Fax: (095)2032717<BR>E-mail: <A=20 href=3D"mailto:igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru">igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru</A><B= R> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> --Boundary_(ID_RwNYt2vFeW+RCzFBKTsVHA)--