Message 2004-02-0009: on universaliy of Phylocode

Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:31:35 +0300

[Previous by date - Cladistics and the PhyloCode]
[Next by date - Re: on universaliy of Phylocode]
[Previous by subject - new thoughts proposed on the PhyloCode]
[Next by subject - pdfs of articles]

Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:31:35 +0300
From: "Igor Ya. Pavlinov" <igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru>
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: on universaliy of Phylocode

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_RwNYt2vFeW+RCzFBKTsVHA)
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="koi8-r"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

In several responces on my last communication, an idea occurs that =
Phylogode is designed for cladists and that those non-cladist guys =
disagree with it are free to go their own way. OK, it looks like a =
special kind of plurality in science which I like very much and even =
published a paper entitled "It is normal for the classificatory =
approaches to be diversed". But does such a nomenclatorial pluralism =
presumes that several Codes of nomenclature are allowed to rule over =
taxonomic community? Suppose rigorous cladists (of whatever school) will =
reject the International Code and will adopt the Phylocode on one of the =
Willi Hennig society meetings - then what about unity of taxonomic =
language in general and nomenclature stability in particular?=20

Igor

P.S. A quesion to the moderator: will you please explane if a responce =
to a comment came from a particular e-mail address woulld circulate over =
all forum participants?
- - -=20
Dr. Igor Ya. Pavlinov
Chief, Division of Mammals
Zoological Museum
Moscow M.V.Lomonosov State University
ul. Bol. Nikitskya, 6
125009 Moscow
Russia
Tel.: (095)2032940
Fax: (095)2032717
E-mail: igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru
=20

--Boundary_(ID_RwNYt2vFeW+RCzFBKTsVHA)
Content-type: text/html;	charset="koi8-r"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dkoi8-r" http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>In several responces on my last=20
communication, an idea occurs that Phylogode is designed for cladists =
and that=20
those non-cladist guys disagree with it are free to go their own way. =
OK, it=20
looks like a special kind of plurality in science which I like very much =
and=20
even published a paper entitled "It is normal for the classificatory =
approaches=20
to be diversed". </FONT><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>But does such =
a=20
nomenclatorial pluralism presumes that several Codes of nomenclature are =
allowed=20
to rule over taxonomic community? Suppose rigorous cladists (of whatever =
school)=20
will reject the International Code and will adopt the Phylocode on =
one&nbsp;of=20
the Willi Hennig society meetings&nbsp;-</FONT><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" =
size=3D2>=20
then what about unity of taxonomic language in general and nomenclature=20
stability in particular? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>Igor</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>P.S. A quesion to the moderator: =
will you=20
please explane if a responce to a comment came from a particular e-mail =
address=20
woulld circulate over all forum participants?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>- - - <BR>Dr. Igor Ya. =
Pavlinov<BR>Chief,=20
Division of Mammals<BR>Zoological Museum<BR>Moscow M.V.Lomonosov State=20
University<BR>ul. Bol. Nikitskya, 6<BR>125009 Moscow<BR>Russia<BR>Tel.:=20
(095)2032940<BR>Fax: (095)2032717<BR>E-mail: <A=20
href=3D"mailto:igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru">igor_pavlinov@zmmu.msu.ru</A><B=
R>&nbsp;</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_RwNYt2vFeW+RCzFBKTsVHA)--

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!