Message 2004-10-0085: Re: The Pancompromise?

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:39:31 +0200

[Previous by date - The Pancompromise?]
[Next by date - Re: Panstems]
[Previous by subject - Re: Thanks :)]
[Next by subject - Re: The Pancompromise?]

Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:39:31 +0200
From: [unknown]
To: PML <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: The Pancompromise?

I just wrote...

> Most people could, I think, probably live with a recommendation tha=
t
looked
> like my attempt below. I understand that the risk is high that both=
 sides
of
> the debate will not like it.

Uh... the 2nd sentence was originally in a less logical place, so I d=
idn't
notice the contradiction... I want to say it's a compromise that woul=
d
probably give everyone an equal dose of mild, although chronic, stoma=
ch
ache. :-} Whether this is an argument for or against it is of course =
yours
to decide.


  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!