[Previous by date - Re: Panstems]
[Next by date - Re: Panstems]
[Previous by subject - Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2]
[Next by subject - Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: [unknown]
To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at, phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2
David Marjanovic (david.marjanovic@gmx.at) wrote: <I don't think so. "Apart from" makes clear what the rule is (namely = the proposed article 10.2), and what the few exceptions from the rule are (Articles 9 and so on).> =2E.. and ... <"No compulsion, restriction or rule of any kind may prevent authors = =66rom constructing and defining names as they see fit, except for the proce= dures established in Article 9, [...]."> I must say, this does look cleaner and makes clear the argument fro= m a codified point of view. Cheers, =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Jaime A. Headden Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to mak= ing leaps in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to = do. We should all learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world arou= nd us rather than zoom by it. "Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969) =09 =09=09 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail=20