[Previous by date - Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2]
[Next by date - Nomenclatural Freedom]
[Previous by subject - Re: Panstems]
[Next by subject - Re: Panstems]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:05:41 +0200
To: PML <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Panstems
> Also perhaps true, though Reptilia has had numerous proposed usages= over the > years- paraphyletic term for non-avian, non-mammalian amnoites; cro= wn for > living reptiles, which includes birds; rejected outright due to its original > paraphyletic nature; etc. Certainly more than Sauropsida, I would = think. Oh, sure -- Sauropsida surely has had only one meaning ever since 191= 6.