Message 2004-10-0049: Re: Panstems

Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:05:41 +0200

[Previous by date - Re: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PHYLOCODE: Article 10.2]
[Next by date - Nomenclatural Freedom]
[Previous by subject - Re: Panstems]
[Next by subject - Re: Panstems]

Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:05:41 +0200
From: [unknown]
To: PML <>
Subject: Re: Panstems

> Also perhaps true, though Reptilia has had numerous proposed usages=
> years- paraphyletic term for non-avian, non-mammalian amnoites; cro=
wn for
> living reptiles, which includes birds; rejected outright due to its
> paraphyletic nature; etc.  Certainly more than Sauropsida, I would =

Oh, sure -- Sauropsida surely has had only one meaning ever since 191=


Feedback to <> is welcome!