[Previous by date - Two mammal clade alternatives]
[Next by date - Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)]
[Previous by subject - Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)]
[Next by subject - Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)]
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:42:25 -0400
From: Kevin de Queiroz <Dequeiroz.Kevin@NMNH.SI.EDU>
To: kritosaurus@netzero.net, phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Please Read (sorry it is long)
In reply to Jonathan Wagner's posting, the PhyloCode Advisory Group has = something like his option F in mind for widely known names and clades = This is what is intended for the "companion volumes." Apart from the = widely known names and clades, things would operate more like his option = H, though this shouldn't cause too much strife in that it would involve = names and clades that are primarily known to smaller groups of speciailists= . Kevin de Queiroz In case you don't remember, Jonathan's options were: F) Each discipline could be responsible for preparing a review = paper establishing the definitions of major converted clade names, effectively trumping priority. I think the odds of this level of cooperation are just about nil. H) We could do nothing. In this case, there will be a great deal of strife, and probably some workers will simply choose to ignore priority = (I'm not so sure I wouldn't).