[Previous by date - Re: Article 11.8]
[Next by date - Re: Now online: Critique of Benton's (2000) "critique" of th=]
[Previous by subject - Note 9.4.1]
[Next by subject - On the Other Phylogenetic Systematics, Nixon and Carpenter]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:22:54 +0100
From: [unknown]
To: PML <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Cc: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Now online: Critique of Benton's (2000) "critique" of the Ph=
Well... actually... as you've correctly guessed, it's nothing special= . I=20 don't say anything there that someone else hasn't already said. The i= dea is=20 just that if somebody asks you "What are you wasting your time on? Be= nton=20 has shown 5 years ago that it's all useless at best!", you can simply= tell=20 them "You think? Click here". It's really horrible to see how many pa= rts of=20 the PhyloCode Benton has simply not read. http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0000265/Benton-Phylocode.htm And while I was at it, I've also updated my (short!) critique of Plat= nick's=20 "critique" of the PhyloCode. Means, I fixed the broken links and clea= ned up=20 the horrible HTML garbage. http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0000265/Platnick-Phylocode.htm It goes without saying that all however vaguely positive criticism is= highly=20 appreciated! :-)=20