[Previous by date - PhyloCode: How much will the Committee have to do?]
[Next by date - Re: PhyloCode: Senter, 2005 and the definition of _Aves_]
[Previous by subject - Fwd: PhyloCode Test Case (Siphonophora?)]
[Next by subject - Fwd: RE: Nathan Wilson's question]
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:46:25 -0500
Subject: Fwd: PhyloCode: How much will the Committee have to do?
David Marjanovic wrote: >While I am at it I would like to repeat my suggestion that we should= slowly >start to quietly drop the capital C of "PhyloCode". It looks a bit s= illy >(thus potentially driving away conservative scholars) -- like a bran= d name; >it seems to have been modeled after that of the BioCode, but the Bio= Code is >dead, buried and fossil, so alluding to it does not make sense anymo= re. > David is right that the name PhyloCode was modeled after that of the= =20 BioCode. David has a good point about the way the capitalized C may= =20 be perceived. I will ask the CPN to consider his proposal. Phil --=20 Philip D. Cantino Professor and Associate Chair Department of Environmental and Plant Biology Ohio University Athens, OH 45701-2979 U.S.A. Phone: (740) 593-1128; 593-1126 Fax: (740) 593-1130 e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org