[Previous by date - Re: Announcement: Second circular of the 1rst International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting]
[Next by date - Two PhyloCode Questions]
[Previous by subject - Re: Animal 'bar codes' to take over from Latin names]
[Next by subject - Re: Announcement: Second circular of the 1rst International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting]
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:39:23 +0200
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>, PML <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: Announcement: Second circular [...] [short!]
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>; "PML" <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:04 PM Subject: Re: Announcement: Second circular of the 1rst International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting > Sorry for the cross-posting... The same again. > (Just looked it up... like I dimly remembered, *Ascaphus* is a > very basal living frog from New Zealand.) AAARGH! As it turns out, I read where *Leiopelma* lives, not where *Ascaphus* lives: along the Pacific coast of North America. > > and by defining the name *Reptiliomorpha* > > Säve-Söderbergh 1934 (converted clade name) as the largest clade that > > includes *Homo sapiens* but not *Ascaphus truei*. > > [...] Considering the fact that "Amniotiformes" has already appeared in the > Internet... why not *Amniotomorpha*? Which has, contrary to my memory, also appeared online, and is used as proposed above. No definition was given, however.