[Previous by date - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Next by date - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Previous by subject - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Next by subject - Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: [unknown]
To: Mailing List - PhyloCode <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms
--- Kevin de Queiroz <Dequeiroz.Kevin@NMNH.SI.EDU> wrote: > Interesting to see that JRW has reintroduced the possibility of all= owing both > names formed using a standard affix and synonyms not so formed to b= e accepted > names (e.g., PanMammalia and Synapsida for the total clade of mamma= ls). I would like to point out that these could be considered heterodefini= tional synonyms. _Synapsida_ =3D clade(_Mammalia_ [_Homo sapiens_, _Ornithorhynchus an= atinus_] not _Reptilia_ [_Lacerta agilis_, _Testudo graeca_, _Crocodylus niloticus= _]) _Pan-Mammalia_ =3D clade(_Mammalia_ [_Homo sapiens_, _Ornithorhynchus= anatinus_] not extant non-_Mammalia_) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> T. Michael Keesey <http://dino.lm.com/contact> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =09=09 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail