[Previous by date - Additions to PhyloCode web site]
[Next by date - Re: Nomina Conversa]
[Previous by subject - Re: Nomina Conversa]
[Next by subject - Re: Nomina Conversa]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:58:37 +0200
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
To: PhyloCode mailing list <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: Nomina Conversa
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, David Marjanovic wrote: > > > > (probably a good idea, since _Chelonia_ is a genus) > > > > Really!?! > > Yes, type of _Cheloniidae_ (within _Testudines_, a.k.a. Order > Chelonia/Testudines/Testudinata) Isn't that *Chelone*, judging from names like *Geochelone*? And don't Chelonia and Testudines/-ata have different contents now (like Ophidia and Serpentes, oe Ichthyopterygia and Ichthyosauria, where one includes basal taxa and the second)?