Message 2004-10-0139: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - aut=

Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:56:24 -0500

[Previous by date - Re: Internet Citation Concerns]
[Next by date - info]
[Previous by subject - Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - aut=]
[Next by subject - Re: ISPN, CPN, and Companion Volume]

Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:56:24 -0500
From: [unknown]
To: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Cc: PML <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: IGNORE THAT LAST MESSAGE: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - aut=

David,

Yes, the example for 3 is silly... no one expects Mammalia to =3D The=
ria. I was
short on time. :)

No, different affices are dealt with in example 1; example two covers=
 same
affix, different, non-synonymous base-names. Example 3 addresses same=
 affix and
synonymous base names.

Jon


Quoting David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>:

> > 2)      Prioirity of taxon names with the SAME affix is resolved =
by a set
> > of explicit rules set out in the protologue of the affix. These r=
ules must
> > state unequivocally how to resolve which of several autonyms shar=
ing the
> > same affix should be chosen. If Corono- has the priority rule "th=
e autonym
> > based on the name of the most inclusive base clade has priority,"=
 and we
> > are asked to choose between Corono-angiospermae and Corono-planta=
e, we
> > would pick Corono=3Dangiospermae.
> >
> > 3)      A third situation, one I did not consider before, must al=
so be
> > dealt with: when the base names of two autonyms are considered sy=
nonymous,
> > the autonym with the base name having priority has priority. If w=
e are
> > asked to consider Pan-mammalia and Pan-theria, where Mammalia has=
 prioirty
> > over Theria, under a hypothesis in which Mammalia =3D Theria, the=
n
> > Pan-mammalia has priority over Pan-theria.
>=20
> I don't understand the difference between these two. Is your exampl=
e for 3)
> erroneous, and does 3) deal with synonymous autonyms with _differen=
t_
> affixes?
>=20
>=20




  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!