[Previous by date - Re: "Qilongia", nomenclature, taxonomy]
[Next by date - ISPN, CPN, and Companion Volume]
[Previous by subject - Re: Fwd: Re: Panstems]
[Next by subject - Re: Fwd: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to each other]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:12:59 +0100
From: [unknown]
To: mightyodinn@yahoo.com
Cc: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Panstems
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 06:56:04 -0700 (PDT) > From: "T. Michael Keesey" <mightyodinn@yahoo.com> >=20 > > Instead of a clade-naming rule or recommendation, I commend a > > simple suggestion that has been made on this list (perhaps by Mik= e > > Keesey? I don't recall). When the name of a clade is written or > > spoken in a way that might be ambiguous, it should be > > disambiguated simply by saying "crown" or "panstem" first. Thus > > we might say that _Confuciusornis_ is a member of "panstem Aves", > > but not of "crown Aves". >=20 > I suggested identifying the type of the clade using an optional > title (and apparently others have as well), but I never suggested > that two different clades could have the same name but different > titles. It would have to be "Panstem Clade _Panaves_" and "Crown > Clade _Aves_". Yes, of course. My mistake -- sorry. _/|_=09 ____________________________________________________________= ___ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> http://www.miketaylor.org= .uk )_v__/\ "Indentation?! - I will show you how to indent when I indent =09 your skull!" -- Klingon Programming Mantra -- Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio =09http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/