Message 2001-12-0014: Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:46:46 +0100

[Previous by date - Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode]
[Next by date - Systematics Association Annual Meeting]
[Previous by subject - Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode]
[Next by subject - Re: Fwd: Animal 'bar codes' to take over from Latin names]

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:46:46 +0100
From: pac <cej@cejchan.gli.cas.cz>
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Fw: languages in PhyloCode

>> 	I like that idea too, but I think that the code should 
>> require that one of the two languages be English because it a 
>> definition were published in Arabic and Chinese (for example), I 
>> would be absolutely unable to decipher it.  After writing this text, 
>> but before sending it, I noticed that Phil and Pete made similar 
>> comments, so there seems to be a consensus on this.

For the same reason, and also for the consistency and ease of use of derived
database(s) my opinion is that PhyloCode should require English
as obligatory. Note that I am NOT native English speaker...

--
Peter A Cejchan
(paleo)biologist
Acad. Sci., Prague, CZ
<cej at cejchan dot gli dot cas dot cz>


  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!