[Previous by date - Fwd: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_]
[Next by date - Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_]
[Previous by subject - Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_]
[Next by subject - Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_]
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 20:08:45 -0800 (PST)
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <mightyodinn@yahoo.com>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu, PhyloCode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Cc: mightyodinn@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: New Dinosauricon Taxon Pages: _Therizinosauria_
--- "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com> wrote: > As I wrote in the original post, each species has a unique prima nomen, > and I just detailed this. I kinda hope it wasn't overlooked originally. So you would want to give every species a unique praenomen (based on a genus name, if available)? Then what's the point of having the second part of the name at all? And how are we supposed to name all those species which have never been type of their own genus? There are millions of named species, and far more currently unnamed. It does not seem possible to give each one a unique, pronounceable name. This is why I (at least provisionally) went with the option of including the citation as part of the full name. ===== =====> T. Michael Keesey <keesey@bigfoot.com> =====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com> =====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com> =====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze> ===== __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com