[Previous by date - RE: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)]
[Next by date - Allosaurus whitei Pickering 1995, a revised online diagnosis, 13 July 2003]
[Previous by subject - Re: VERY Stupid question, but I dont know the answer...]
[Next by subject - Re: Vermes]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 00:14:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: StephanPickering@cs.com
To: PhyloCode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: Validity of *Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum* Pickering (1996)
--Boundary_(ID_z2auASWKlLnvb53ZKtuz8g) Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Once more, we have an individual who does not know what he is talking about, offering his latest installment in Victorian phrenological mesmerism. He states that my 1996 publication is not a "professionally accepted work" -- who are the professionals he is referring to? I specified a new species, with type specimen designated, provisional diagnosis presented, horizon specified, referred specimens for the hypodigm. Two dinosaur scholars I have profound respect for -- George Olshevsky & Tracy Ford (who, unlike Qilongia, have published extensively), received copies of my publications in 1995 and 1996. That Don Glut, without contacting me, offered an unjustified emendation of a valid scientific name does not negate my taxon. As Qilongia has yet to publish a thorough analysis of the specimens involved, who has yet to publish anything on dinosaurs and phylogenetic systematics, and as he is intent on propogating cacophony in lieu of scientific discourse re: Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum -- I find his latest exercise petulant and pseudoscientific. STEPHAN PICKERING / Chofetz Chayim ben-Avraham The Dinosaur Fractals Project 2333 Portola Drive # 4 Santa Cruz, California 95062-4250 USA stephanpickering@cs.com website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleo_bio_dinosaur_ontology theropod research summarized: <www.dinodata.net> see under PICKERING at their Reference Base --Boundary_(ID_z2auASWKlLnvb53ZKtuz8g) Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"= Times New Roman" LANG=3D"0"> Once more, we ha= ve an individual who does not know what he is talking about, offering his la= test installment in Victorian phrenological mesmerism. He states that my 199= 6 publication is not a "professionally accepted work" -- who are the profess= ionals he is referring to? I specified a new species, with type specimen des= ignated, provisional diagnosis presented, horizon specified, referred specim= ens for the hypodigm. Two dinosaur scholars I have profound respect for -- G= eorge Olshevsky & Tracy Ford (who, unlike Qilongia, have published exten= sively), received copies of my publications in 1995 and 1996. That Don Glut,= without contacting me, offered an unjustified emendation of a valid scienti= fic name does not negate my taxon. As Qilongia has yet to publish a thorough= analysis of the specimens involved, who has yet to publish anything on dino= saurs and phylogenetic systematics, and as he is intent on propogating cacop= hony in lieu of scientific discourse re: <I>Tyrannosaurus stanwinstonorum --= </I>I find his latest exercise petulant and pseudoscientific. </FONT><FONT=20= COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D1 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"Georgi= a" LANG=3D"0"><B>STEPHAN PICKERING / Chofetz Chayim ben-Avraham <BR>The Dinosaur Fractals Project <BR>2333 Portola Drive # 4 <BR>Santa Cruz, California 95062-4250 USA <BR>stephanpickering@cs.com <BR>website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleo_bio_dinosaur_ontology <BR>theropod research summarized: <www.dinodata.net> see under PICKERI= NG at their Reference Base</B></FONT></HTML> --Boundary_(ID_z2auASWKlLnvb53ZKtuz8g)--