Message 2004-10-0127: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms

Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:18:24 -0700 (PDT)

[Previous by date - Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Next by date - Plant clade names was PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Previous by subject - Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms]
[Next by subject - Re: Fwd: Re: Homonyms Between Preexisting Codes]

Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: [unknown]
To: Mailing List - PhyloCode <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: PROPOSED ARTICLE X - autonyms

--- Philip Cantino <cantino@ohiou.edu> wrote:

> >Michael Keesey wrote:
> >
> >"the total clade of _Angiospermae_ (assuming it is made a crown cl=
ade) has
> >never been given a name, to my knowledge, so there is no need to s=
et up a
> >clade synonymous with the autonym."
>=20
> Louis Chinnery asked:
>=20
> >There are competing names, e.g. the typified Magnoliophyta. Could =
the
> >existing typified names be used for one class of clade providing t=
hat the
> >name is not currently being applied to a polyphyletic group?
>=20
> Magnoliophyta could be defined as applying to the panstem, but this=
=20
> would likely confuse people because Magnoliophyta and Angiospermae=
=20
> are widely understood by botanists to be alternative names for the=
=20
> same clade.  The same applies to other pairs of typified versus=
=20
> untypified names (e.g., Equisetophyta and Sphenophyta, Pinophyta an=
d=20
> Coniferophyta, Lamiaceae and Labiatae).

This isn't my domain, as such, but couldn't the typified names, named=
 after
genera, be crowns, while the untypified names, which seem to all be n=
amed after
characters, be apomorphy-based?


=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> T. Michael Keesey <http://dino.lm.com/contact>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D


=09=09
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!