Message 2005-12-0018: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:26:29 -0700 (PDT)

[Previous by date - Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki]
[Next by date - Re: Multiple definitions? was Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki]
[Previous by subject - Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa]
[Next by subject - Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa]

Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu, mike@miketaylor.org.uk
Subject: Re: Stormbergia dangershoeki, new Early Jurassic ornithischian from South Africa

All,

  I am very worried that once any group starts demanding strict prior=
ity,
foolish or misthought definitions and specifier choices of plastic or=
 variable
"taxa" will be used, to cause clade name application to far exceed in=
tent and
even use. There must be some plasticity without having to appeal to a=
 board for
decisions, yet preserve the sense of adherence of priority in some wa=
y. I do
not have a solution, however.

  Cheers,

Jaime A. Headden

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)


=09
=09=09
__________________________________=20
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005=20
http://mail.yahoo.com

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!