[Previous by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Previous by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:17:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?
> <<<5. After the nomenclature of a part of the tree has been set in = stone > in this way, anyone can name newly discovered clades in that part a= nd > can immediately register them durably.>>> > > [...] At which point are we to agree that a topology is to be true > _enough_ and names applied [...] Sufficiently "wise" definitions can take care of that. This is the ve= ry=20 point of giving enough thought to definitions so that the contents st= ay as=20 stable as possible. It's also the point of several existing rules &= =20 recommendations. --=20 Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko! Satte Provisionen f=FCr GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner