Message 2005-12-0031: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:17:47 +0200 (MEST)

[Previous by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by date - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Previous by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]
[Next by subject - Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?]

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:17:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: An alternative to the Companion Volume?

> <<<5. After the nomenclature of a part of the tree has been set in =
stone
> in this way, anyone can name newly discovered clades in that part a=
nd
> can immediately register them durably.>>>
>
> [...] At which point are we to agree that a topology is to be true
> _enough_ and names applied [...]

Sufficiently "wise" definitions can take care of that. This is the ve=
ry=20
point of giving enough thought to definitions so that the contents st=
ay as=20
stable as possible. It's also the point of several existing rules &=
=20
recommendations.

--=20
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen f=FCr GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner

  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!