[Previous by date - Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=]
[Next by date - Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=]
[Previous by subject - Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=]
[Next by subject - Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: [unknown]
To: Mailing List - PhyloCode <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: REPOST: Crowns, Panstems, and their Correspondence to ea=
--- David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote: > But of course, double capitalization or any other method wo= uld > greatly reduce the size of this problem -- as long as typographic e= rrors, > and _assumptions_ of typos in others' works, won't become too commo= n. Double capitalization alone would not work, because, for example, pap= er titles are sometimes printed in all capitals. "A REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION OF _PANARTHROPODA_" -- does it refer to to _PanArthropoda_ or _Panarthro= poda_? (Easily solved with a hyphen, of course.) > >> > To achieve a unified system, some names, such as this one, would ha= ve to be > defined differently than originally used. The only way around this= problem > would be to use affixes that had never been used before=97ever, but= this > strategy isn=92t ideal either. > << > > Why not? You try and come up with an affix that hasn't been used before! (A pronounceable one, now....) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> T. Michael Keesey <http://dino.lm.com/contact> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =09=09 _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool