[Previous by date - Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?]
[Next by date - Re: First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting]
[Previous by subject - Fw: Must read!]
[Next by subject - Fw: PhyloCode]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:51:24 +0200
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
To: PML <phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Fw: Pan-clades, good or bad?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com> To: <dinosaur@usc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:06 AM > > A good point. After all and for instance, Insecta, when first used > > by Linnaeus, included crustaceans as well as insects. I can't > > imagine anyone arguing for a redefinition of Insecta based on this. > > If molecular phylogenies of Arthropoda have any significance- how > prescient of him. Of course (and ironically, might I add), that clade > is now called Pancrustacea.