Message 2002-02-0023: Re: interesting style of definition

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:25:16 -0500 (EST)

[Previous by date - Re: Crown clade definitions (was: Re: interesting style of definition)]
[Next by date - RE: interesting style of definition]
[Previous by subject - Re: interesting style of definition]
[Next by subject - Re: languages in PhyloCode]

Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:25:16 -0500 (EST)
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
To: "Jonathan R. Wagner" <jonathan.r.wagner@mail.utexas.edu>
Cc: -PhyloCode Mailing List- <PhyloCode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: interesting style of definition

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Jonathan R. Wagner wrote:

>     I think C is pretty unequivocally "nearer in descent" to B, in that
> their lineages (the trail of ancestry and descent leading from each back
> through time) share a longer common segment than either does with A. Or, to
> put it another way, their lineages diverged more recently than their common
> lineage did with C. Or an even better way: they share a community of descent
> independent of C. They share community of descent independent of C, and in
> turn this group will have a similar relationship with other taxa, and so on,
> proceeding by incrementally quantized degrees of propinquity of descent.
>
>     The diagram above represents a nonunique solution: there is no objective
> measure of anagenetic distance, at least for (phenotypic) morphology. There
> may be for genetic distance, I just don't know. By my understanding, this is
> why phenetics and gradistics both fail to provide an objective method of
> classifying organisms... the "distance" factors are ultimately
> unreproduceable (and there are philosophical reasons why this should be so).
> Hence, propinquity of descent is the only (theoretically) objective means of
> delineating named groups of species (or organisms, if you don't care for
> that class of entity).

Okay, I understand the issue there -- I'm really just wondering if
everyone uses the term "related" in the cladistic sense (regardless of
whether they should).

_____________________________________________________________________________
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
 The Dinosauricon        <http://dinosauricon.com>
  BloodySteak             <http://www.bloodysteak.com>
   personal                <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
    Dinosauricon-related    <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
     AOL Instant Messenger   <Ric Blayze>
      ICQ                     <77314901>
       Yahoo! Messenger        <Mighty Odinn>


  

Feedback to <mike@indexdata.com> is welcome!