[Previous by date - Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Next by date - Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Previous by subject - Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
[Next by subject - Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:14:02 +0100 (MET)
From: [unknown]
To: phylocode@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu
Subject: Re: PhyloCode: Re: PhyloCode Taxonomic Classifications
> If PhyloCode wins it will take over the vocabulary of Evolution. Sorry, I don't understand that either. ~:-) > So with Evolution species is just a construct of language and not > something that really exists in nature? Maybe -- but for the PhyloCode this doesn't matter. The PhyloCode is = only=20 for naming clades. The problem of how to name species will be tackled= =20 later, in a separate document. (However, the PhyloCode makes it possible not to use species if you t= hink=20 they don't exist. Some people think so.) --=20 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse f=FCr Mail, Message, More +++